xyz SolidWorks autocad
From my firsst day in engineering school, until my previous position as engineering manager; We have gotten to test Solidworks vs AutoCAD side-by-side. I have tried personally AutoCAD, AutoCAD 3d and the latest versions of Solidworks. Autodesk owns AutoCAD and Dassault Systemes owns Solidworks. From the company standpoint, each company has lots of products/divisions. To begin, each company has ventured beyond CAD products which I can't speculate on because I don't quite know how or maybe another products are related to their CAD products and the way it ties within their greater strategy. Autodesk owns 4 CAD goods that I'm aware of. The other 3 include; Inventor, Revit and 3ds Max. Dassault Systemes owns just one other product; Catia. From the company perspective, I confide with Dassault Systemes. They're emphasizing an extremely narrow but large market, particularly pertaining to mechanical engineers and aerospace engineers. Autodesk alternatively is apparently wanting to fill holes on the market and overextending themselves. Their original product was great, 2d drafting software that worked perfect for architecture and buildings.
Software
Here is my Solidworks vs AutoCAD take. I'm that Solidworks is more preferable fitted to designing complex systems and machines, and AutoCAD 3d is way better suited for civil engineers and those who design less complex systems. It really is a smaller amount automated and much more challenging to change things on the fly. The analogy I'd give is Solidworks is sort of a word processor and AutoCAD is similar to a typrwriter. Since Solidworks is feature driven, features can be edited in context as well as the user are able to see how a changes modify the entire system. Solidworks has numerous tools that mimic the actual manufacturing processes; for instance hole wizard. This really is essentially like an entire, drill, tap, countersink and counterbore index and allows the user to place complex hole paterns within minutes. Additionally, it includes a integrated library of all of the starndard and a few non-standard hardware. It is then quite easy to automade the style process. I've personally saved all of the hardware within the default Solidworks library that individuals used in our inventory and given it the related inventory part number so i could just pick and pull and set parts.
The sheet metal features in Solidworks are perfect, an individual can essentially draw what you can imagine then transform it to sheet metal. The software will figure out the flat patern where to bend it to make your complex sheet metal part. It is remarkable. The application is also in a position to mimick way parts and assemblies will move together to ensure that interference is visible before cutting any metal.
Software
Software
Here is my Solidworks vs AutoCAD take. I'm that Solidworks is more preferable fitted to designing complex systems and machines, and AutoCAD 3d is way better suited for civil engineers and those who design less complex systems. It really is a smaller amount automated and much more challenging to change things on the fly. The analogy I'd give is Solidworks is sort of a word processor and AutoCAD is similar to a typrwriter. Since Solidworks is feature driven, features can be edited in context as well as the user are able to see how a changes modify the entire system. Solidworks has numerous tools that mimic the actual manufacturing processes; for instance hole wizard. This really is essentially like an entire, drill, tap, countersink and counterbore index and allows the user to place complex hole paterns within minutes. Additionally, it includes a integrated library of all of the starndard and a few non-standard hardware. It is then quite easy to automade the style process. I've personally saved all of the hardware within the default Solidworks library that individuals used in our inventory and given it the related inventory part number so i could just pick and pull and set parts.
The sheet metal features in Solidworks are perfect, an individual can essentially draw what you can imagine then transform it to sheet metal. The software will figure out the flat patern where to bend it to make your complex sheet metal part. It is remarkable. The application is also in a position to mimick way parts and assemblies will move together to ensure that interference is visible before cutting any metal.
Software